Alders approved transferring $5.6 million from the city’s debt service other accounts to cover fire and police overtime.
During the first Board of Alders meeting of the month Monday night at City Hall, they voted for the approval over the objection of one colleague who raised concerns about kicking the ongoing public safety overtime problem down the road.
In a 21 to 1 vote, alders approved transferring $1.4 million from the debt service account to pump up fire overtime by $1.1 million and the fire salary account by $300,000. In a separate 21 to 1, they approved moving $2.2 million from the police salary account and $2 million from the debt service account. The police overtime account would get $4 million and police equipment account $200,000.
Downtown Alder Abigail Roth, the lone vote against the transfers, said she was concerned that by “papering-over” the public safety’s overtime problem with what amounts to an accounting maneuver was “removing the pressure of addressing the issue now.”
The Harp administration is using surplus funds achieved through a $160 million refinancing of the city’s debt to cover the cost. (Read more about that here.) Roth said it’s fiscally irresponsible to draw from current debt service payments to cover excess operating expenses.
“I believe we need to undertake independent studies of fire and police now so we can come up with objective strategic ideas for addressing issues now,” she said.
East Rock Alder Anna Festa said Monday she stood “hesitantly in support” of the transfer to cover police overtime. She said she hoped that the chiefs of fire and police understood from the most recent Finance Committee meeting that alders expect them to reconcile some of their overtime costs in the future and look for ways to save on equipment contracts.
“I will be supporting this item because we either pay now or we pay later,” Festa said of her support of the transfers. But she said the city must be mindful of what it means when moving money from debt services to pay for operating expenses.
“It’s like paying for your mortgage with your credit card,” she said.
Mayor Harp's city is a responder city, not a proactive one, and why she need not again run.
I think the biggest argument against her reelection is her unwillingness to tackle the "Siren City" issue for her entire tenure. (The second is her fawning obsequience to UNITE HERE destroying economic development EVERYWHERE.)
If fire and police OT and sirens, firetrucks, AMR vehicles, police vehicles are a barometer for the social milieu and cohesion of a city, New Haven is under siege, everywhere and always. I found it rather ironic that is a recent performance of GOOD FAITH (a play about among other things the NH Fire Department) the cast member had to pause as the audience laughed nervously as ear piercing sirens went by. The city is in a constant awash of first responders, always responding, and while obviously as a compassionate person I want aid to victims, sending firetrucks and having AMR have a stranglehold on the city is destroying the social fabric. Where is the balance between quality of life and compassionate, effective, rapid urgent care?
What has Harp done about it? What have the alders done? Now we are kicking the can down to road towards the cliff of bankruptcy simply because we can't close a fire station or two? Or figure out away to get lifesaving equipment to a scene without using fire engines?
A telling line in the play GOOD FAITH was when (to paraphrase) a firefighters tells it like it is: "You can't close a fire station b/c that is our community, that is our home." Consolidate the stations and instead invest in smaller 4x4 vehicles that can respond to the scene of a crime or accident obviating the need to send firetrucks like a 9/11 replay everyday in town.
Another Harp administration means one thing for NH and everyone knows it: bankruptcy. We need to elect a business savvy problem solver who will take on the bullies and also wrestle with UNITE HERE and the conflicts of interest there.