Ex-Marine Launches Lonely Quest

Paul Bass PhotoDo you have a gun here in the studio today?
No. I left my gun at home.
What if the Democrats come in and take you out?
I use my hands. I’m a Marine.

Angel Cadena, New Haven U.S. Rep. Rosa DeLauro’s Republican rival in this fall’s Congressional election, developed an appreciation for the Second Amendment as a kid growing up on Chicago’s South Side, where he watched a gang member’s bullet strike his father.

Cadena was 13 years old at the time. He, his father, his 15-year-old sister Christina, and a friend of Christina had just taken a bus ride home from seeing Jurassic Park at a movie theater.

They were a block away from their home in the Gage Park neighborhood, where gangs like the Latin Kings were in business. Christina and her friend ran ahead.

Here’s how Cadena recalls what happened next:

Shots rang out. “King killer!” someone shouted.

Cadena was used to hearing and seeing bullets fly. This time was “a lot closer than usual.”

He saw his father stumble.

“I’ve been shot,” his father said. He told Cadena to run, and Cadena started to. Then “something made me stop,” Cadena said.

He turned around. He saw his father had been shot in the foot. The bullet remains in his father’s foot to this day.

“I put my arms around him. I went into the next gangway, the space between two buildings. There was a large fence. We were going to scale the fence. [But then] there’s a huge dog on the other side of the fence,” Cadena said.

There was no escape, as two armed young men pulled up on bicycles. Cadena’s father “put me behind him.” One of the young men put a gun to his father’s head. He pulled the trigger.

“I was expecting to die,” Cadena said. “I wasn’t really scared anymore.”

But their would-be killer had run out of bullets.

“I didn’t see nothing!” Cadena’s father insisted. The two assailants hopped back on their bikes and pedaled away.

Cadena, who now lives in Shelton, recalled that story during an interview on WNHH’s “Dateline New Haven” program. It was a campaign interview, his first on radio, since the Republican Party nominated him to challenge Democrat DeLauro in this November’s election for the Third U.S. Congressional District seat.

Gun control is one of the brightest lines between the two candidates. DeLauro’s for it; in June she participated in a pro-gun control sit-in with fellow liberal Democrats on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives. She co-sponsored a bill to ban the sale of assault weapons. Cadena’s a proud advocate of the Second Amendment, and the interpretation that individuals’ right to “keep and bear arms”  for the sake of “a well-regulated militia” means individuals have the right to own AR-15s.

Not Scared

WNHH: Do people need assault rifles?
Cadena: I have one.
WNHH: What kind do you have?
Cadena: AR-15.
WNHH: Why do you need an assault rifle?
Cadena: Just In case the government ever gets out of pocket.
WNHH: Just a minute. You aren’t going to be able to take on the government with an AR-15. They have a lot more AR-15s. They got tanks. They got bombs.
Cadena: There’s over 100 million people in this country with guns. I don’t think the government’s going to do anything to make a dent.

In Cadena’s campaign against DeLauro, however, he has few reinforcements. He’s not expecting money or troops from the Republican Party. The GOP has written off trying to unseat DeLauro for more than two decades. It hasn’t recruited experienced candidates to oppose her since she won her second term in 1992 and went on to become one of the leading Democrats in the House.

And Cadena, who is 35 years old and lives in Shelton, doesn’t even have much free time to run. He drives a truck 12 to 16 hours a day, six days a week, making deliveries to Whole Foods outlets in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New York, and New Jersey. (Asked if he purchases Whole Foods products, he responded, “I can’t afford it.”)

But he decided that someone should run against DeLauro, he said. Members of Congress shouldn’t be able to waltz back into office every two years without a challenge.

And as a conservative, he fundamentally disagrees with the liberal Congresswoman, from guns to sugar. He opposes DeLauro’s call for a tax on sugary soft drinks, for instance: “That is a total waste of time. We have bigger priorities to deal with than figuring out how to tax people. We need to make our economy more dynamic.”

It quickly became clear in the interview that Cadena, the son of a Mexican-American mother and Puerto Rican father, a trained massage therapist-turned-Marine who watched a buddy explode in a convoy in Afghanistan, doesn’t fit into neat categories for political candidates. Or for Donald Trump supporters. Of which he is one. And proud.

Hand-To-Hand

WNHH: There aren’t too many Republican Second Amendment massage therapists out there.
Cadena: I span the whole spectrum. I can heal people with my hands. And I can hurt them with my hands. ...
WNHH: How does it feel to be a Latino for Trump when he was calling Latino immigrants rapists and thugs?
Cadena: I don’t think about it racially. I think about it nationally. Our country is a special place. It’s the last bastion on earth where a person like myself, a poor minority, could extend and have my foot in the door of the most powerful legislative body in the world.
WNHH: Why does that make you a Donald Trump supporter? He hasn’t been a big friend of people of color getting their foot in the door.
Cadena: Donald Trump doesn’t run the day-to-day operations of his businesses. He was one of the first people in Florida to open his golf resort to minorities. If we elect Donald Trump, we’re going to have more jobs.
WNHH: Do you want to build a wall?
Cadena: Correct.
WNHH: You don’t want more people like your mother’s family coming into the the country?
Cadena: Not freely. If there’s no challenges for people to come here of their own free will, then they’re not going to assimilate properly into the culture.
WNHH: What about a pathway to citizenship for people who are already here?
Cadena: I don’t have a problem with it if they don’t have a place to go. … If they’re good Americans. The criminals, out. Elements of that kind, out right away. Everybody else, there should be a process.
WNHH: Can a wall work? Is it worth spending all that money?
Cadena: Ask Israel.

Cadena called himself a supporter of the police. It took a while to get there.

As an eight-year-old in Chicago, he had a negative take on police. At least the ones who smashed his Chiclets.

Cadena and his older brother Reyes (who is no longer alive) started a business buying boxes of Chiclets gum and reselling them at a profit to local grocers. At times, he said, the police would stop them on their rounds. “They would take our gum. Smash it. Drive over it with the police car,” Cadena said.

Why would police do that to little kids? Because, Cadena, said, “they had their favorites” — other kids who also sold Chiclets at a profit.

“I felt they were oppressing me,” he said of the police. “They were keeping me from achieving what I was trying to achieve at the time, which was to buy candy and video games.” As he grew older, though, he came to “respect them a lot. They do a lot for communities.” One day he found himself working as a security guard for one of the cops who “ran over my gum” back in the day. He reminded the man of that. “He laughed,” Cadena said. “We just left it at that.”

The experience did leave him with concerns about government overreach, he said — about, say, government regulators shutting down kids’ lemonade stands, which he insisted is a problem in the U.S. But he didn’t harbor a Chiclets grudge. “It’s a dog-eat-dog world,” he said.

“A Great Shot”

WNHH: Did your father have a gun that day [he was shot]?
Cadena: No.
WNHH: What could you have done if your father had a gun?
Cadena: Protect ourselves.
WNHH: With two younger people … if he pulled a gun, wouldn’t it have been more likely that they would have hurt him?
Cadena: My father’s a great shot.
WNHH: What about someone who’s not a great shot?
Cadena: That’s up to each individual to decide.
WNHH: But basically everyone should be a great shot, or too bad if you get shot?
Cadena: No, but everybody, if they’re able-bodied and they’re willing to take the responsiblity to protect themselves and protect those around them, there shouldnt’ be no issues about it. That’s part of what the American experience is about, the ability to protect yourself.
WNHH: But if there are gangs with a lot of firepower, at some point aren’t there going to be a lot of innocent people hurt unless we have some protection [from police and other crime-fighting efforts instead]?
Cadena: There’s already innocent people being hurt.
WNHH: Won’t there be a lot more if there’s lawlessness and everyone has guns?
Cadena: That’s not lawlessness. That’s the way the way it’s supposed to be. …

Click on or download the above sound file to hear the full interview with Angel Cadena on WNHH radio’s “Dateline New Haven.” The interview includes an account of Cadena’s military service in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Tags: , , ,

Post a Comment

Commenting has closed for this entry

Comments

posted by: LookOut on September 2, 2016  2:20pm

refreshing to see a politician in CT who ‘get’s it’ on a variety of issues.

posted by: fearless on September 2, 2016  2:24pm

No need for anyone to own an assault weapon except police and military. This guy would use it against the government that he wants to represent if “they get out of pocket”. whatever that means . Another gun crazed lunatic   Like we don’t have enough. Vote for this guy?  Sorry about his father but assault rifles kill lots of people at once no need. What’s wrong with a liscensed handgun for protection.  This guy is not ready for prime time. Too dangerous and cavalier about weapons

posted by: Atwater on September 2, 2016  2:45pm

This guy is a hack. Luckily DeLauro will beat him handedly in the election. It would be nice if there was a serious candidate who could oppose her though. But, this is American now, one party of gun nuts and crypto-fascists and one party of corporatist-centrists.

posted by: Chucky_Dee on September 2, 2016  3:06pm

Sounds like they BOTH favor gun control - She wants to take them away from the law-abiding, but He wants to take them away from criminals!

posted by: OhHum on September 2, 2016  3:16pm

It’s amazing that all Rosa needs to do is submit her name to be put on the ballot and she’ll receive an automatic win. Is she doing something very right or is there something very wrong with a system that will rubber stamp a win for a candidate. I have to give Mr. Cadena credit for running against the monolith in the 31st District. If one could find a bumper sticker for Rosa it might read ROSA for LIFE. wow! Thinking about it, that’s much better than what a Clinton bumper sticker might read. LIFE for HILLARY. Just saying.

posted by: jim1 on September 2, 2016  5:17pm

I have been a lifetime Dem. I am also a X Marine, and like guns. So my vote goes to him, not HER. {and get the same old same old.}.

posted by: THREEFIFTHS on September 2, 2016  5:50pm

Cadena: Donald Trump doesn’t run the day-to-day operations of his businesses. He was one of the first people in Florida to open his golf resort to minorities. If we elect Donald Trump, we’re going to have more jobs.

What is up with this.

EXCLUSIVE: Donald Trump stayed silent when his dad said ‘I don’t rent to n——-s’ in rejecting black tenant’s bid for Queens apartment in 1963, ex-employee claim.

At some point in 1963, Maxine Brown, a black registered nurse with impeccable credit, applied for an apartment at the Wilshire.She was calling me on a daily basis, wanted to know the status of the application. I had her checked out and she should have been accepted,” Leibowitz recalled.eibowitz described what happened when he showed Brown’s application to Fred Trump while Donald was standing alongside his father.“I asked him, ‘What do you want me to do with this application?’ He said, ‘You know I don’t rent to n——-s. Put it in your desk drawer.’

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/donald-trump-dad-don-rent-n-s-1963-article-1.2774947

posted by: robn on September 2, 2016  6:05pm

The poll (in addition to fronting questions about guns) seems a bit click baity. Nevertheless I answered in a way that appears contrary to my desire to have fewer weapons on the street. That answer was no, because civil a don’t own assault rifles….they are already illegal for civilians to own. The term “assault rifle” only applies to weapons that can switch from single fire to burst/automatic; again, those weapons are already illegal for civilians to own. The rifles that most people think are assault rifles are only aesthetically related. In terms of function they have a multi round magazine and can only fire as fast as one can pull the trigger. Unless one bans everything except muskets and bolt action rifles, most every other rifle does the same thing as the consumer rifles that look so scary and which are incorrectly referred to as assault rifles.

posted by: Cityhallobserver on September 2, 2016  9:47pm

“Do you have a gun here in the studio” ? Because he’s pro 2nd amendment you ask him that question.  If someone had a license to carry at Pulse in Orlando, 49 people might be alive.  The gang bangers and thugs are running the streets of every U.S. city.  Have you heard of the heartbreaking gun violence in Chicago where there are strict gun laws? Wake up people, we have a gang war going on and there aren’t enough police to address the problem.  The innocent victims pushing strollers deserve better.  Life time politicians are part of the problem, nothing ever changes.  We need term limits.  Good luck Angel, you sound like a hard working person trying to make a difference for your family.

posted by: Mopar on September 3, 2016  7:17am

“Fearless”: how is a so-called assault weapon any different from a handgun? The only ones civilians get to own, such as the AR-15, may look the same as the M-16 police and military use, but it functions exactly the same as a handgun or hunting rifle.

posted by: wendy1 on September 3, 2016  8:29am

Anyone calling themselves Republican needs therapy.  I’d rather vote for an anarchist.

posted by: eliantonio on September 3, 2016  12:20pm

He is spot on about Israel’s wall. 
Hmmm, why don’t we ever hear or talk about their wall?

posted by: jim1 on September 3, 2016  5:22pm

robn the term assault rifle is a term used to put guns that look like military rifles in a group.
Also full auto guns {will fire till you release trigger} can be owned by anyone if they go thru all the paper work. Finger prints photo letter from the chief police officer of the town you live in. They are called class 3 weapons.
Also I have a 1860 British Enfield rifle that fits the definition of a assault rifle as it has a baronet lug and a pistol grip.

posted by: OhHum on September 3, 2016  7:43pm

Wendy1 says, “Anyone calling themselves Republican needs therapy.” OhHum says,  Anyone who says this about millions of people is defined as a bigot. I certainly hope you’re not a Democrat you would be an embarrassment to the party. Just saying.

posted by: robn on September 3, 2016  8:23pm

J1,

You left out that this includes only fully automatic weapons manufactured prior to 1986 and only if approved by the ATF.

posted by: William Kurtz on September 3, 2016  11:14pm

robn,

‘Assault weapon’ is a term of art with no accepted legal or technical definition since 2004.

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/06/13/qa-what-is-an-assault-weapon/

posted by: TheMadcap on September 4, 2016  1:37am

“If someone had a license to carry at Pulse in Orlando, 49 people might be alive.”

Or, you have numerous more people dead as 6 concealed carriers start shooting at each other

posted by: robn on September 4, 2016  9:06am

WK,

The NHI used the correct term which is “assault rifle” (sometimes conflated with “assault weapon”) and although I’d agree with you aboit legal definitions, military and police have a clear definition; that is a rifle capable of selective fire (single shot (semi-automatic) or fully automatic (a machine gun)).

My point is that this….
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruger_Mini-14#/media/File:Mini14GB.jpg

...has the same basic capability as this…
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/AR-15_variant#/media/File:Stag2wi_.jpg

Both fire bullets as fast as you can pull the trigger. It’s worth noting that one can fire around 45-60 rounds per minute with a semi-automatic rifle but a well trained shooter can fire a bolt action rifle only about 1-2 seconds slower. And that lever action Winchester (the gun that won the west…manufactured in New Haven CT) is somewhere in between.

So all rifles are deadly in the hands of a nutcase.

posted by: alphabravocharlie on September 4, 2016  1:59pm

He’s got my vote. Rosa’s s little left of Karl Marx.

posted by: William Kurtz on September 4, 2016  9:56pm

“So all rifles are deadly in the hands of a nutcase.”

Yes, I agree. And this quibbling over terminology and technical specifications; no one has to be intimately familiar with arcane minutiae to have informed opinions about gun policy in the U.S. Not knowing the difference—or even if there is a difference—between a ‘clip’ and a ‘magazine’ isn’t disqualifying. To argue that it is is a favorite tool of the gun “enthusiast”.

The current political obsession over ‘assault’ weapons, though, is a dangerous red herring. AR-15s are like SARS or bird flu or shark attacks. They’re big and scary, and even though statistically they represent only a minor threat they get a lot of attention. The real damage is being done by handguns—they’re akin to diabetes or heart disease.

posted by: Christopher Schaefer on September 6, 2016  8:37am

As usual, the biased news media makes no mention whatsoever of the only SERIOUS candidate in this race: https://christopherschaefer4congress.com/