Judge Sidelines EastCoastin’ Organizer

Sophie Sonnenfeld photoThomas Breen photoIf Gabe Canestri Jr. “solicits, organizes, holds or participates in” any unpermitted motorcycle events in the city over the next three years, he could go to prison.

That was the outcome of Canestri’s latest and final state court appearance Wednesday for a criminal case stemming from his organizing of the Sept. 25 “EastCoastin’ 2021” motorcycle event in the Annex.

While the EastCoastin organizer’s criminal case is now over, the city plans on launching a new civil action against him in a bid to collect on roughly $82,000 in overtime costs resulting from the event.

Over 5,000 people flooded the city’s industrial waterfront on Sept. 25 for the officially city-“cancelled” annual event that saw Harley Davidson riders travel from throughout the Northeast to rev their engines, do motorcycle stunts and burnouts, and temporarily take over Waterfront Street.

In a third-floor courtroom at 121 Elm St. Wednesday, Canestri pleaded nolo contendere to a substitute charge of reckless endangerment for his role in organizing and promoting the unpermitted event. (City police initially arrested him on charges of breach of peace and inciting a riot. Thanks to a plea deal struck with state prosecutors, Canestri’s earlier charges were dropped and the motorcyclist was hit instead with one misdemeanor count of reckless endangerment.)

State Superior Court Judge Philip Scarpelino found Canestri guilty of that reckless endangerment charge based on the facts presented by Supervisory Assistant State’s Attorney David Strollo and city Corporation Counsel Patricia King.

The judge’s sentence, per the terms of the plea deal struck by state prosecutors and Canestri’s lawyer Richard Tropiano Jr., was a suspended one-year prison sentence and a three-year conditional discharge.

Implicit in that conditional discharge is that Canestri have “no new arrests,” Scarpellino told him in open court.

The more case-specific conditions are that Canestri not “solicit, organize, hold or participate in any motorcycle event” in the city over the next three years “unless it is properly permitted.”

During Wednesday’s hearing, Strollo made the state’s case for why Canestri should be found guilty of reckless endangerment.

Thousands of people descended on the city on Sept. 25 because EastCoastin was “widely publicized on social media,” Strollo said.

“This defendant, despite police in the city telling him not to host the event, still hosted the event.”

The motorcyclists who participated did wheelies, spun their tires, and endangered people nearby, Strollo continued. “The way these motorcycles were being operated created a great risk of injury to other people.”

Speaking on behalf of the city—which was technically the “victim” in this criminal case—King said that the city incurred roughly $82,000 in costs related to EastCoastin. In previous interviews, Acting Police Chief Renee Dominguez and Mayor Justin Elicker have said those costs stemmed from overtime incurred by the roughly 150 city police officers and other public works staffers who worked the event.

King said that the city intends to pursue restitution of that $82,000 “through the civil process,” and therefore not through the criminal proceeding that concluded Wednesday.

She also asked the judge to include as a condition of Canestri’s discharge that he be prohibited from organizing or participating in an unpermitted motorcycle event in the city as both an individual and through a “third party.” Scarpellino included that “third party” language in his final conditions of discharge.

Scarpellino explained in court that nolo contendere means no contest. Canestri’s nolo plea means that he is not pleading guilty to the charge—but nevertheless accepts the judge’s finding of guilty and subsequent sentence. His nolo plea cannot be used as “proof positive” that he admits to any future civil charges or damages stemming from this same event, Scarpellino said.

“Would you like to say anything [to the court], Mr. Canestri?” the judge asked.

“No,” Canestri replied.

Mayor: Separate Civil Case Coming

Thomas Breen file photoMayor Elicker welcomed Scarpellino’s decision Wednesday in a statement provided to the Independent.

“Judge Scarpellino made it clear that Mr. Canestri will be held accountable for his illegal activities that had a negative impact on the city,” he said.

“While the judge didn’t include restitution as part of the criminal case, we do intend to pursue restitution through civil court. Our police department continues to investigate other individuals involved in this event and will bring additional charges when appropriate.”

Tags: , , , , ,

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to comment

If you already have an account, please log in here | If not, please .

Comments

posted by: AverageTaxpayer on December 1, 2021  3:39pm

So much for New Haven becoming the Sturgis of the East….

posted by: Noteworthy on December 1, 2021  4:48pm

For the love of God - give it up Elicker. First of all - there is no way that half our police department got deployed to this event, nor that it was needed. That’s more cops than do crowd control on St. Pat’s Day or anything else. Secondly - the criminal roster is replete with those found guilty or actually pleaded guilty who consumed massive amounts of city resources. Does the city pursue restitution from them? No. So what you have here is unequal protection under the law. Secondly - if Elicker is so worried about overtime costs, he should revisit his effort to exempt tens of millions of dollars in new apartment construction from paying their property taxes. Stop the arrogance and self righteousness. Move on.

posted by: Belgi85 on December 1, 2021  5:03pm

Laconia is already the Sturgis is the east.  Both are small towns that are built on a tourist economy, Sturgis specifically on the bike rally, and Laconia on both bike week and Winnepasake.  New Haven is too densely populated and the economy too diversified with a year round population too high to justify the inconvenience this thing causes. If it was better organized, then maybe it could be a welcome addition to town. Based on the last few years, this thing causes more headaches to the people of new haven then the economic or cultural impact it brings in.

posted by: CityYankee2 on December 1, 2021  5:04pm

HOw many times do we get to commit a crime before there is a consequence? He already did the crime so why no time???
They should’ve also charged him with arrested development

posted by: Bill Saunders on December 1, 2021  8:49pm

Having a legitimate permit for a long running Arts Festival didn’t help me one iota when I got arrested for ‘inciting a riot’!
In fact, it was an excuse for the system to dig their heels in, and drag the process out….

posted by: Chernobyl on December 2, 2021  2:07am

As this event was a blatant act of defiance, I would have thought the city could get not only the cost of the cops and public works out of these reprobates, but also punitive damages. If they have to sell their bikes to pay the bill then they won’t be back anytime soon. Wake up and do your job properly, Corporation Counsel.

posted by: new havener on December 2, 2021  8:11am

I’d love to see the Summertime gang of motorcyclists brought before Strollo & Scarpellino…

“The motorcyclists who participated did wheelies, spun their tires, and endangered people nearby, Strollo continued. “The way these motorcycles were being operated created a great risk of injury to other people.”

Imagine…the large crews riding roughshod through New Haven & neighboring towns, ignoring traffic lights, stop signs, riding wheelies, intimidating anyone they come across, vs the ‘East Coast’ event, limited to a little-used side-street in an industrial area.

This is just pathetic.

posted by: Kraven Moorehead on December 2, 2021  12:38pm

So I was just wondering how many of the people who shut down the streets and I-95 in protest were arrested, talk about white privilege eh?

posted by: manofthepeople on December 2, 2021  10:54pm

Classic. Only the white guy get in trouble. Especially after the city originally allowed him to hold his event, and then waited until it would cause financial harm to cancel the event before “cancelling it”.

This makes me continue to lose respect for the leadership of new haven.