Welcome To A Mess, Superintendent Birks

Christopher Peak PhotosLiam Brennan is the father of two current and two future NHPS students.

(Opinion) March roars into New Haven bringing not only spring but a new superintendent. Carol Birks, the victor of the Board of Education’s controversial hiring-by-fire process, faces an uphill battle as she takes the reins of Elm City public schools this coming Monday. City and state officials have bequeathed to her a system afflicted with deep challenges and left parents wondering whether she is a remedy to — or just a product of — a negligent government.

My personal experience with the issues facing New Haven Public Schools came in the fall of 2015. My son’s teacher was on extended sick leave and NHPS was unable to find substitute teachers on a regular basis. Days passed in which the paraprofessional assigned to the class was left alone with the students. The administrators sporadically rotated the art teacher and other specialists into the classroom, but their freedom to pull educators from the other students was limited. The situation was only resolved when the original teacher finally quit around Thanksgiving, freeing the district to hire a full-time replacement.

NHPS’s failure to staff my son’s classroom opened my eyes to the legitimate reasons that cause some parents with economic means to decamp to the suburbs or splurge for private schools. While a racism-fueled white flight explains much of the disparity between school districts - including why schools in the Northeast are more segregated now than they were in 1968 - the economic consequences of that flight further compound the problem. Even anti-racists can fairly ask if they want to deal with a school system that cannot consistently put a teacher in a classroom. 

But, when wealthier students withdraw from city schools it has detrimental effects on everyone else. A University of California, Riverside study found that students in mixed-income schools showed 30 percent more growth in test scores in high school than peers with similar socioeconomic backgrounds in schools with concentrated poverty. The National Bureau of Economic Research similarly concluded that low-income students attending more affluent schools scored roughly two years of learning ahead of low-income students in high-poverty schools.

This dynamic exists everywhere, but Connecticut’s unique school-funding scheme exacerbates the problem. Schools in Connecticut are more reliant on local property taxes than those in any other state, apart from New Hampshire. That means a city like New Haven, where the median income is $40,457 and 49.4% of the land in the city is tax-exempt, pays its teachers less than a surrounding town like Woodbridge, where the median income is $138,386 and 91% of the land is taxable. The discrepancy is more acute when New Haven is compared with even wealthier locales like Greenwich. A Greenwich teacher with only a bachelor’s degree starts earning approximately $11,000 more per year than a New Haven teacher; one with a master’s degree earns $15,000 more than his or her Elm City counterpart.

State educational policy only aggravates the inequalities produced by the overreliance on local taxation. Connecticut’s primary route for assisting local governments with educational costs - the educational cost sharing grant - is farcical in its distribution. It routinely underfunds poorer municipalities while overfunding wealthy towns.

Unfortunately, New Haven has no discernable plan to address the capital’s gaps. NHPS spends a smaller percentage of its budget on salaries and benefits than other towns, but in 2015 allocated 13% of school funds - a whopping $56.5 million - to the offices of Operations and Special Education for undefined “services and supplies.” 

The mayor approaches education erratically - throwing the last superintendent’s job into question one morning and then reversing course by the afternoon. She .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)rising graduation rates, improved college enrollment and greater student and teacher satisfaction under his leadership, but then decided it was worth over $150,000 to fire him early and leave the district without a superintendent for a year and a half. 

WTNHRather than being the “education watchdog” proponents claim it is, the Board of Education has turned into a circus. It gave busy parents only one-day notice before superintendent search meetings. It set objective standards to select potential superintendents but, when no local applicants met those standards, the Board - including Mayor Harp - backtracked. The result? Qualified candidates withdrew from consideration. Three finalists emerged from this process - one of which was a local candidate who did not meet the Board’s original criteria and a second was Birks, who immediately provoked a backlash amongst parents and teachers. Behavior hit a new low when threats of lawsuits and duels caused security guards to separate Board members.

These shenanigans obscure the best aspects of New Haven schools. The public schools educate students from every racial and economic background, every creed, and ability. No private school matches this commitment; no charter or suburban system rivals this breadth. On performance, researchers at Stanford recently had good news for the Elm City. They attempted to measure school effectiveness, examining how much students progress as they move through school. By their analysis, New Haven students advanced five years in learning through five years of schooling. While this news may appear to be a low bar, it put New Haven in the 60th percentile for effectiveness, beating out school districts like Madison, Branford, Fairfield and New Canaan.

But towns like Woodbridge, Guilford, and Greenwich do better even by these measures.  Being in the 60th percentile for effectiveness leaves a lot of room for improvement. Moreover, too many New Haven students start from a position of disadvantage — struggling with poverty, homelessness, or learning English as a second language. If we want them to leave school as educated as students in other districts, five years of learning in five years of schooling are not enough. The truth is, we are asking our teachers to do more than those in other towns. This requires an ambitious plan. So far, the city and the state do not have one.

Carol Birks, here’s hoping you do. Welcome to New Haven.

Liam Brennan is the father of two current and two future NHPS students. You can reach him on Twitter at @LBNewHaven.

Post a Comment

Commenting has closed for this entry

Comments

posted by: 1644 on March 15, 2018  1:42pm

1.  The cost of living is far higher in Greenwich than in New Haven.  It is unremarkable that teacher salaries should also be higher.
2.  60% percentile is safely above average.  By definition, half of all systems will always be below average, no matter haw good they are.
3. While many have emphasized a perceived need for poor, black kids to sit near richer, whiter kids to succeed, Booker T. shows that black kids, with mostly black teachers, can, on their own, do as well as the suburban white kids.
4.  State aid is heavily skewed to poor urban areas: e.g., state aid comprises about 3% of Branford’s budget, while about 50% of New Haven’s budget.  Branford, BTW, has a diverse population and an average income of $70K, just about average in CT.

posted by: HewNaven on March 15, 2018  3:58pm

I think the author may have hurt his points by noting the school “effectiveness” study from Stanford. If you tell someone that our schools are performing somewhere in between Woodbridge and Madison, they would say, “keep up the good work, New Haven!”

The bottom line is we’ve had the DATA for a long time and nothing has changed. Try a different approach. Start talking to the students and their parents and trying to understand where they’re coming from. I like the idea from a recent article of students taking BoE members on a tour of their facilities and classrooms. Roll up your sleeves, NHV!

posted by: Jill_the_Pill on March 15, 2018  4:09pm

>>> a whopping $56.5 million - to the offices of Operations and Special Education for undefined “services and supplies.”

This is where transparency is essential.  NHPS Advocates requested and received a detailed breakdown of this year’s contracts to date.  The district has it posted, along with the answers to a slew of other questions, at http://www.nhps.net/node/3626.

posted by: THREEFIFTHS on March 15, 2018  4:26pm

posted by: 1644 on March 15, 2018 1:42pm

While many have emphasized a perceived need for poor, black kids to sit near richer, whiter kids to succeed, Booker T. shows that black kids, with mostly black teachers, can, on their own, do as well as the suburban white kids.

Keep drinking the Charter School Kool-Aid.

posted by: Kevin McCarthy on March 15, 2018  5:21pm

1644, teachers are not required to live in the municipality where they teach. In fact, the law (CGS § 10-155f) explicitly bars residency requirements for teachers.

posted by: Jessica.Light on March 15, 2018  5:40pm

This was very well written. Thank you for looking at the big picture and connecting the dots between the various stories.  I am hopeful NHPS can address these issues without just sliding all these past issues under the rug.

posted by: UBHolden on March 15, 2018  6:17pm

I doubt that—as a percentage—New Haven spends less on salaries and benefits than other towns.  This is certainly an accounting gimmick that takes salary/benefit costs of some teachers and counts them as something else in order to “bring down” the overall cost.

posted by: Callisto on March 15, 2018  7:48pm

Great screen grab. Shakespearean!!

posted by: MarcoHaven on March 15, 2018  8:04pm

I didn’t see anyone suggest a residency requirement for teachers, but they should give hiring preference to those who care enough about the city and the students to live here.

posted by: rmurphy on March 15, 2018  9:33pm

posted by: 1644 on March 15, 2018 1:42pm
Branford, BTW, has a diverse population and an average income of $70K, just about average in CT.

In what ways is Branford’s population diverse? It’s 94% white, 96% living above the poverty line—is it diverse in some other way?

posted by: 1644 on March 17, 2018  6:54am

Murphy:  Branford has varied housing options from run-down trailer parks to multi-million dollar shorefront and island homes.  Twenty seven percent of its school kids need free or reduced price lunches,  yet it also has one billionaire and many millionaires.  My guess is that the standard deviation of family income in Branford is far higher than in New Haven.