Markeshia Ricks Photo
Abrams at Woolsey Hall as part of a two-day conference on democracy.
Political superstar Stacey Abrams stopped by her alma mater to to deliver a warning: a failure to protect the vote is costing us our democracy and our standing in the world.
Abrams, a former state senator who narrowly lost a bid for governor of Georgia, sat down with former U.S. Secretary of State and fellow Yalie John Kerry, at Woolsey Hall to talk about defending democracy as part of a two-day conference hosted by the Kerry Initiative-Yale Jackson Institute for Global Affairs.
She said voting is a fundamental right that is being eroded in the United States — not by fraud but by suppression.
The Yale Law grad, who was the first black woman major-party gubernatorial nominee and delivered the Democratic party response to the president’s State of the Union this year, didn’t pull any punches about what she thinks needs to happen in the coming 2020 presidential election. Voters need not just to kick President Donald Trump out of office but must also swing the pendulum away from oligarchy and authoritarian rule, she argued. And for Abrams, it all starts with voting.
Former U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry with Abrams.
She described what happened during her gubernatorial race in Georgia — long lines at reduced black polling stations, problems with absentee ballots, purging of voter rolls — as part of a long effort that began with the end of Reconstruction and picked up steam with the erosion of the Voting Rights Act in 2013, when “any of the restraints on stripping people of their right to vote were removed.”
Voter suppression, she said, looks like defunding counties with high numbers of black people so that they don’t have the resources they need at election time. It looks like declaring English as the only official language. It’s making an ID card necessary to cast a vote in places where it is difficult for some people to obtain such identification. It’s making it harder for college students to vote on campus, or to use their student IDs for identification.
“It is systemic and systematic,” she said. “There never was a rash of voter fraud. We can’t get 50 percent of Americans to do anything. No one is putting on a wig and a mustache to vote twice.”
Former U.S. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta asks a question while former U.S. Secretary Madeline Albright looks on.
Kerry said his goal for the conference wasn’t to have partisan conversations that only one party (not Democrats) seems actively engaged in voter suppression. Abrams concurred noting that the nation is changing and only one party (not Republicans) has tried to embrace that change. Both Kerry and Abrams are Democrats.
“There is one party that is heterogeneous, that is intentionally diverse,” she said. “Not necessarily always great at managing that diversity but at least we know it exists.
“And there is another party that is shrinking demographically — that is homogeneous and that recognizes that the loss of power that is directly correlated with an increase in diversity means the diminution of not only power but resources and money and the ability to impose values,” Abrams continued. “When you recognize that that is happening you start to see every law and every rule in a different light.”
She has started an organization, Fair Fight Action, to press the issue of voter access to the ballot.
“What we have to do in 2020 is sound the alarm,” she said. “We have to talk about [voter supression] as relentlessly as the lie of voter fraud is spread. Because if we do not call it what it is we will not address it.”
Abrams said fighting voter suppression matters because it is key to pushing back against the authoritarian behavior of Trump, that is enabled by a Senate benefiting from what she called the president’s “ineptitude.”
“So yes, you get a tax cut. but also you get the war in Yemen,” she said. “Part of the responsibility we have is that we have to reclaim our international reputation, which cannot be reclaimed until we can prove that we are actually still a democracy. And that means a very robust engagement in the 2020 election not only to change the leadership. You can vote for a Democrat; you can vote for [third-party hopeful] William Weld. It is most important that we replace the current occupant [of the White House] with someone who respects the presidency and respects the integrity of our international standing and that’s what we don’t have.”
Abrams: We have to prove we’re still a democracy.
When people don’t vote, can’t vote, or are kept from voting so that they won’t have a voice, it flies in the face of America’s centuries of democratic tradition, Abrams said.
“Why that terrifies me is that things don’t simply stop because America ceases to participate,” she said. “In fact, we know that there is an acceleration of the erosion of global democracy
“We stand as an example of what should be because of how badly we have failed. America is an example of why democracy is important because we have had to correct ourselves so many times. Acknowledging that black people are actually wholly human, acknowledging that women should be allowed to be part of the body politic, making Native Americans citizens, moving away from our fairly xenophobic immigration policies over time, each of those moments of correction stand as signals to the rest of the world that we can get better, not that democracy is perfect, that we are made more perfect by each of our corrections and that when we stop correcting ourselves, and worse when we celebrate our ignominy we undermine our value as part of an international conversation.”
Abrams concluded that this current moment in history is less a reignition of the Civil Rights movement and “more of an existential crisis” for the nation.
She said the right to vote is the only way the nation makes policy on climate change, reproductive choice, immigration. In a democracy, voting rights are for everyone, she said. And when certain groups are targeted for voter suppression.It erodes the rights of everyone.
“Whatever your issue is. The right to vote is the only mechanism,” she said. “The right to vote is one that is when guaranteed for all guarantees for all. We have to reclaim our democracy.”
Click the play button to catch the full conversation between Kerry and Abrams.
Riddle me this Paul,
Why must users of this site relinquish access to our computer information to FaceBook to watch the videos you record and place here, and by doing so independently draw conclusions of events we were unable to attend?
This unnecessary quip pro quo (we get a video, FB (and you?) get access to our computers) takes more from the reader than it gives, and it makes some of us feel manipulated by a news source, whose responsibility is to provide the public information, not to take data from us in the process.
[Paul: Thank you for that question! I must admit -- I hadn't thought about this. I will spend time during the Passover holiday thinking about it. I've been so excited about using Facebook Live. It enables us to beam live events in full immediately to people on our Facebook page, and let people weigh in on them. Then we can embed that video in (we hope!) a thoughtful subsequent story, providing source material for readers who want more. We really don't have the capacity, especially with radio and speeches, to provide that video any other way, and I feel it is deeply valuable. But I also agree with you that all bargains with Facebook are Faustian, because of the way we are in fact unpaid labor for the company to mine and market our data through the use of our site.
[We at the Independent never ever will market or even collect data on our readers to anyone. Period. Full stop. But you make such a good point -- what happens once we embed a Facebook video in a story? Maybe people more knowledgeable than I can weigh in here, including Rev. Ross-Lee. If someone clicks on an embedded video, what happens? Does Facebook then track that user, the way it tracks someone accessing Facebook by directly logging onto Facebook through a Facebook account? I'm guessing yes, but perhaps with some differences, but I don't really know. I would like to understand specifically what information gets collected when someone clicks on an embedded video, and how it's used -- and whether, perhaps, we could address that with a disclaimer letting people know that by clicking on it they will subject themselves to Facebook's data-mining practices ...]