Sections

Neighborhoods

Features

Follow Us

NHI Newsletter

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links

Black Power Plea: Don’t Get “Pimped” Again

by Paul Bass | Mar 25, 2013 7:11 am

(10) Comments | Commenting has been closed | E-mail the Author

Posted to: Black History, Politics, Dixwell, Campaign 2013

Paul Bass Photo With four mayoral candidates looking on, Clifton Graves presented an election-year choice to an African-American church crowd: Organize as one voice. Or prepare to be “pimped” again by City Hall.

Graves offered that advice toward the close of an hour-long panel discussion on “the current and future status of black power in New Haven.” Rev. Jerry Streets organized the event in a basement hall at Dixwell Avenue Congregational United Church of Christ following Sunday worship services. The Register’s Shahid Abdul-Karim moderated the discussion. Some 50 people attended, including four announced and soon-to-announce Democratic mayoral candidates.

“We have become pimped and manipulated by folk downtown—in some cases folk that look like us,” Graves remarked at the end of the discussion. “We’ve got organizations. We’re just not organized.”

Graves (pictured at the top of the story), an attorney and civil-rights activist, was not a member of the three-person official panel. He stood to the side below a “Revive Us Again” sign, listening to the discussion before offering his views.

But he had perhaps the most experience in the room with the subject at hand. He has been an active participants in civil rights campaigns in New Haven since the 1980s. His mentor was the Dixwell Avenue Congregational Church’s longtime pastor, the late Rev. Edwin “Doc” Edmonds, who negotiated on behalf of the black community with white powerbrokers for decades and helped grow the black middle-class through jobs in the city public schools. (Click here to read about Edmonds.) Graves was in the rooms—including at this church—for planning meetings leading to the successful mayoral candidacy of John Daniels, New Haven’s first and only African-American chief executive. He worked for Mayor Daniels and watched Daniels’ coalition collapse, leading Daniels to retire after just four years in office. Graves has since watched Daniels’ former opponent, John DeStefano, hold onto the mayor’s job for 20 years. (DeStefano is retiring at the end of this year.) Two years ago Graves ran unsuccessfully against DeStefano for mayor; Graves and another African-American candidate, Tony Dawson, almost evenly split the black vote in a four-way field.

This year could see as many as four viable African-American candidates seeking the Democratic nomination for mayor, as well as two white candidates.

Since Rev. Edmonds’ day, black leaders have wrestled with the election-year question of when it makes more sense to unite behind a mayoral candidate of color versus when it makes more sense to bargain with a white candidate who can deliver more benefits to the African-American community. Part of the question for Edmonds was tactical: The prospects of a black candidate’s victory versus the prospects of coming out ahead in coalition with a white candidate bound to win anyway. Part of the question has always involved the issue that Graves defined Sunday as “pimping”: How to define the good of the community; whether benefits for some African-American job-seekers or developers or community groups translated into empowerment for the broader community.

At Sunday’s forum on black power, one of the official panelists, Dorothy Harper, a Democratic ward co-chairwoman in the Bella Vista senior complex, advised the African-American candidates to unite behind just one candidate this year so as to avoid splitting the vote.

Another panelist, Paul Nunez (the late Rev. Edmonds’ grandson-in-law), suggested that the black vote and black community opinion are “not monolithic.” That’s a healthy sign, he argued. “Folks have different points of view. We are a community that’s large enough that it might be difficult to speak with one voice, because of the progress we’ve made.”

When he added his remarks, Graves took a different view from both Nunez and Harper.

The important challenge for the black community is to unite its many organizations as one voice rather than wait for a political candidate to speak for the community, Graves argued. Unity trumps any one particular candidacy.

And while he acknowledged that not everyone can agree on every issue, Graves argued groups can find “common ground”—and need to—in order to exert influence on elections.

Graves spoke of how non-black politicos would “laugh” at the splintered black community when he ran for mayor in 2011. He said outsiders knew the black community had the numbers to help determine the outcome of a Democratic primary, but it lacked the unity. He recommended that a Black Community Council be formed today as an umbrella of African-American organizations. (Forty years ago such an organization existed in New Haven. It was called the Black Coalition. It negotiated with Yale on a community-benefits-style deal, for instance, and mobilized a communal response to the Mayday 1970 protests over a Black Panther murder trial. It also produced the city’s first African-American mayoral candidate with a real shot at winning, Henry “Hank” Parker.)

“Democracy is tough,” Graves said. Tough, but essential.

He recalled how different factions in the black community united with white progressives to elect John Daniels, a state senator, to the mayor’s office in 1989 against a party machine-backed white candidate with no electoral experience—John DeStefano.

Then he recalled how “infighting” and “selfishness” destroyed that coalition and allowed DeStefano to win the office in 1993—and stay in office for two decades. He said DeStefano was able to divide and conquer and “pimp” the black community.

Then Graves mentioned the four official and soon-to-be-official 2013 mayoral candidates in the room. He said the black community needs a single institutional voice “so a Gary Holder-Winfield (at right in photo), a Jack Keyes, a Sundiata Keitazulu, a Kermit Carolina has someone to” deal with.

“They can’t do it by themselves,” Graves said.

Tags: , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share |

Post a Comment

Comments

posted by: Threefifths on March 25, 2013  8:17am

If Blacks do not want to be Pimped Again,Then they need to throw the Democratic Party under the bus and form there own party.As Malcolm X said in the speech The Ballot or the Bullet.You give white politicians all of your support, and get nothing in return. You put the Democrats first, and they put you last.

Another panelist, Paul Nunez (the late Rev. Edmonds’ grandson-in-law), suggested that the black vote and black community opinion are “not monolithic.” That’s a healthy sign, he argued. “Folks have different points of view. We are a community that’s large enough that it might be difficult to speak with one voice, because of the progress we’ve made.”

Do your homework.The different points of view is call the house and field negroes or the Black Boule.

posted by: sillyputty on March 25, 2013  8:44am

The article says this: “Two years ago Graves ran unsuccessfully against DeStefano for mayor; Graves and another African-American candidate, Tony Dawson, almost evenly split the black vote in a four-way field.” 

What does that mean?  What’s counted as the “black vote”?  Is the implication that DeStefano didn’t get any of the “black vote”?  I think that’s demonstrably false.

posted by: FromTheHill on March 25, 2013  9:23am

I voted for Graves, I’m white.

posted by: HewNaven on March 25, 2013  10:27am

Why is it impossible for someone like Graves to imagine that Black people have more than one voice, and are not simply a monolithic voter bloc to be won over by politicians? Its kind of an antiquated viewpoint, no?

posted by: anonymous on March 25, 2013  11:34am

Sillyputty - you are correct, the “black vote” in 2011 was split among four candidates, not just the two candidates who were African-American.

Three-fifths is correct that the Democratic Party has gone off track. For example, it largely failed to stand up for pedestrian safety and reduced pollution on the Route 34 project, even though that project sits within an “environmental justice” zone with high asthma and an overwhelming concentration of Black and Latino residents and residents who do not drive.  These roads are being widened using tens of millions of dollars in public funding, in order to provide benefit to politically-connected developers, Yale, big city contractors, and suburban elites. 

The Democratic party also supported spending $50 million on an unnecessary Amtrak bridge over the Route 1 strip mall in Branford.  That money would have gone several times farther to create permanent jobs for everyone (Branford residents included), and reduced pollution for Black and Latino families, if it had been spent on more urgently-needed infrastructure in New Haven instead.  But Rosa DeLauro’s bridge building contractor friends might not have seen such a large pay-out.

Imagine what the hundreds of millions of Democratic Party dollars earmarked for boondoggles such as Route 34, the Flyover, and the Amtrak Bridge could have done if it they had been spent instead on badly-needed transportation & safety improvements within inner city neighborhoods where the “black vote” is concentrated.

posted by: streever on March 25, 2013  4:23pm

Anonymous: Amen! Thank you to Unite Here for dumping their colleagues who fought the boondoggles because it was politically expedient. Sadly, if anyone is “organizing” the people who most suffer because of that betrayal, it is Unite Here, and I don’t think they’ll start pointing out how badly they’ve backstabbed their constituents.

posted by: HewNaven on March 25, 2013  4:41pm

3/5 is actually right! As long as the Democratic party is in favor of doing business as usual (i.e. single-bottom line thinking) they are essentially the same as Republicans. We need a new party to gather all the new energy in politics. We need a party that does not put money first, but rather health and diversity. These are the true metrics of progress and resilience. Seeing through the lens of money will only confuse our real common goals.

posted by: Fair and Honest on March 25, 2013  6:13pm

I agree—we should unite behind a candidate, if we can.  But it should be the best candidate.

I’m going to vote for the best candidate for the city and for us, whether the rest of y’all come along with me or not.

posted by: Jones Gore on March 27, 2013  9:07am

I agree what he says about the Mayor.

posted by: Powers on March 27, 2013  10:32am

The entire city needs to unite around a candidate that is best for all sectors, and no offense to Mr. Graves, but the last thing New Haven needs is another Mayor Daniels.

Events Calendar

loading…

SeeClickFix »

Street Lamp
Dec 20, 2014 7:30 am
Address: 95 Canner Street New Haven, CT 06511, USA
Rating: 4

Illegal Dumping
Dec 20, 2014 7:28 am
Address: 32 Canner Street New Haven, CT 06511, USA
Rating: 4

The lower part of Canner st is becoming a dump. public works please fix this. Thank...

more »

PosterWallAdd your Poster

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

smartpill design