Sections

Neighborhoods

Features

Follow Us

NHI Newsletter

Some Favorite Sites

Government/ Community Links

Candidates Call For Deeper Response To Newhallville Violence

by Paul Bass | May 23, 2013 7:14 am

(11) Comments | Commenting has been closed | E-mail the Author

Posted to: Newhallville, Campaign 2013

Days after another daylight fusillade of bullets on Newhallville’s streets and a decision by Yale to pull out of a home-building project due to safety concerns, mayoral candidates Wednesday called for creative new approaches from the city to bring order to the neighborhood.

They called for more of a police presence—and they’re receiving it. The police have saturated the neighborhood with officers and investigators to follow up on the recent incidents of gunfire; the U.S. Attorney’s Office is sending investigators to help. Five of the six incidents of reported gunfire that took place in New Haven last week occurred in Newhallville.

The candidates—two of whom live in Newhallville—also called for longer-term solutions, from a crackdown on absentee slumlords to more job creation, to address the ongoing violence in the neighborhood.

At the root of the discussion is an elusive search for an explanation—an explanation for why, as shootings continue to decline everywhere else in New Haven, including in neighborhoods with similar rates of poverty, the violence has remained so concentrated in Newhallville. Each week few if any bullets fly, few if any major crimes occur along the southern corridor of Dixwell Avenue that anchors the Dixwell neighborhood.

Paul Bass Photo Candidate Sundiata Keitazulu (pictured) had just finished seeking contributions to his campaign Sunday afternoon on Shelton Avenue, and had just left the area, when gunshots rang out there.

The next day he was visiting a campaign supporter on Read Street. Moments after he left, two groups of young men—as yet unidentified—engaged in an apparent shoot-out. They didn’t hit each other; they did hit some cars.

Keitazulu, who owns a plumbing business (“Nate the Snake”) on Shelton Avenue, noted that lots of school-aged kids live where those shoot-outs occurred, some of whom wait for buses by the corner there.

“It’s a great decision,” Keitazulu said of the ramp-up this week of police patrols and investigations in the neighborhood. “They have to do it. They also have to keep their presence there.

“But the whole problem with this area is it’s underdeveloped. There’s no money in this area, no jobs in this area. There’s a lot of abandoned houses in this area. Nobody wants to move in this area. They don’t feel safe.”

Nemerson called for a greater presence of not just cops but also housing regulators in Newhallville, as well as street-sweepers and street-lighting repair crews. Police not just the shooters, but also the absentee landlords, he said.

“Let’s get more LCI [Livable City Initiative] inspectors out there. Let’s be monitoring Section 8 tenants and landlords much more closely. And let’s make sure there’s a uniform treatment of the streets. When you have streets with trash and rundown houses, people are hanging out,” Nemerson argued.

Candidate Matthew Nemerson also noted the predominance of abandoned and rundown, absentee-owned houses in Newhallville. He said young people who cause trouble tend to congregate by those properties.

Newhallville has been a particular focus for out-of-town speculators and other investors who have collected Section 8 rents without fixing up properties—and in some cases committing mortgage fraud to pocket money intended for repairs. Dixwell, by contrast, is anchored by well-managed blocks of homes in the Monterey Place development (which replaced a former high-crime development known as Elm Haven) as well as owner-occupied single-family homes on Frances Hunter Drive. Closer to Yale, it also regularly sees university as well as city cops in the area.

State Rep. Gary Holder-Winfield, who lives on Winchester Avenue in Newhallville, issued a statement calling for “an examination of the city’s approaches to handgun trafficking and youth violence” in the wake of the latest gunfire. He distributed a video (found at the top of this story) of recent remarks he made in the Capitol about the need to deal with trauma experienced by young people exposed to gun violence as well as the need to deal not just with Sandy Hook-style assault weapons, but, as he put it in Wednesday’s release, with “the illegal handguns that flood our city and endanger our neighborhoods.”

In other campaign-related news:

4 Pitch To Yale Union: The Executive Board of Local 34 of UNITE/HERE, Yale’s largest union and the most successful source of vote-pulling help for candidates in New Haven elections, invited four of the Democratic mayoral candidates to its College Street offices Tuesday evening to make half-hour pitches for the group’s endorsement.

The union invited candidates Toni Harp, Henry Fernandez, Kermit Carolina, and Justin Elicker, all of whom showed up.

Union President Laurie Kennington said the board probably won’t make a decision on an endorsement for at least some weeks. There has been much speculation in town that the union will support Harp, especially after many union-backed aldermen attended her campaign kick-off rally last Saturday and she hired a veteran UNITE/HERE staffer as a campaign consultant. Kennington said the union has definitely not made a decision yet, and that the campaign consultant, formerly affiliated with UNITE/HERE Local 217, does not currently work for the union.

Kennington said the union decided upon which candidates to invite Tuesday night based on “who our folks were most excited about and feedback from the [Central] Labor Council” based on interviews it had done with the hopefuls.

“I must have said something that annoyed them,” speculated one of the non-invitees, candidate Matt Nemerson. He said he’d met personally with local UNITE/HERE leader Bob Proto and organizer Gwen Mills. “I have been very clear that I think we’re going to have to put all the issues in front of the city, in front of the unions and the taxpayers, and the taxpayers have to have equal standing at the table.”

So Much For Promises: Nemerson (pictured) also said he didn’t have a full explanation for why his campaign has not yet made good on a promise to be immediately “transparent” about money it raises.

Amid criticism for his decision not to participate in New Haven’s public-financing Democracy Fund, Nemerson said the names of all contributors and the amounts they donate would appear within 48 hours on his campaign website. (Read about that here.) Candidates who agree to participate in the Democracy Fund receive a public grant and matching dollars in return for limiting individual contributions to $370 (rather than $1,000) and forswearing donations from outside committees.

Nemerson said his campaign started collecting contributions last week. As of Wednesday afternoon, the site listed no contributions. It did have a page set up ready to accept people’s contributions.

“There’s no explanation” beyond the fact that his campaign hadn’t yet set up the section for recording and publishing the donation information, Nemerson said. “We’re still working on it.”

Tags: , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share |

Post a Comment

Comments

posted by: William Kurtz on May 22, 2013  6:43pm

Representative Holder-WInfield is right. Horrifying as it is, the Newtown gun massacre was an anomaly (although it seems like less of one in recent years). It was frightening and attention grabbing—the SARS or bird flu, if you will, of gun violence, with the diabetes being the gunfire that’s steadily destroying quality of life in urban neighborhoods.

Federal lawmakers, predictably, fell into the trap of trying to pass legislation intended to prevent another Sandy Hook leaving the gun fanatics and ‘patriots’ reasonably pointing out that Manchin-Toomey would likely have had little chance of preventing the Newtown shootings.

The gun lobby has an army of single-issue voters at its disposal to intimidate lawmakers. Nothing’s going to change until those of us who want change—an overwhelming number of people, especially when you count the people most immediately affected by urban gun violence—show the same commitment.

posted by: Elizabethaiken on May 22, 2013  6:58pm

I am surprised and disappointed that the Executive Branch of Local 34 Unite/Here didn’t give all the candidates a chance to speak.

posted by: Threefifths on May 22, 2013  8:47pm

If the Black community wants these shootings to stop,Then Blackman most start patrolling the neighborhoods. Also what happen to the Guardian Angels?

posted by: taodhdaodh on May 23, 2013  9:41am

“So much for promises” is a bit harsh. Readers prefer to draw their own conclusions from unbiased reporting (and copy-editing). I don’t support Nemerson, in part because of the concerns raised in other articles on this site, but Paul’s displaced anti-Brancati bias (which is not, itself, unfounded) is unduly infecting his reporting on Nemerson. I wish he’d take as hard an approach on the other candidates, particularly the other two who’ve rejected the Democracy Fund.

posted by: Curious on May 23, 2013  10:32am

Threefifths, the Guardian Angels actively patrol Wooster Square at night, of all places.  That’s also where they have recruiting posters up.  Maybe they would rather not get shot at while patrolling?

You should see if you can get the Flaming Knights to patrol!  Then maybe New Haven could be a little more “Sons of Anarchy” and a little less “The Wire”.

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Flaming-Knights-Motorcycle-Club-New-Haven-Chapter/301011619697

posted by: Curious on May 23, 2013  10:36am

Why doesn’t Laurie Kennington get the candidates to a debate in front of the membership?  Then ask us what WE think?  How about that?  Or is she so much better suited to making this decision FOR us?

We only get asked our opinion when they spoon-feed us the answers they want us to give.  This is sick.

posted by: cunningham on May 23, 2013  10:59am

You still see Guardian Angels in Edgewood from time to time, usually on or around the corner of Ellsworth and Elm. I don’t know what kind of presence they ever had in Newhallville.

posted by: Proud New Havener on May 23, 2013  6:25pm

Three-Fifths, that’s a great idea. Even though the patrol couldn’t be everywhere, it would send a message, which is more persuasive coming from friends, family and neighbors, rather than the police.

posted by: Threefifths on May 24, 2013  8:26am

@ Proud New Havener

When I was in new york Blackmmen did patrols in Brooklyn New York.The Jewish community even now have patrols in Brooklyn.It can be done.

In Protecting Hasidic Neighborhoods, Squads Patrol Without Guns or Badges

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/04/nyregion/04patrol.html?_r=0


Muslims Start Patrol to Fight Crack in Brooklyn

http://www.nytimes.com/1988/01/23/nyregion/muslims-start-patrol-to-fight-crack-in-brooklyn.html

posted by: Brian L. Jenkins on May 24, 2013  12:14pm

The idea that abandoned dwellings and absentee landlords somehow is part and parcel the steering force behind the array of shootings in the area is not only laughable but ridiculously absurd.

I venture to say that these young men don’t live in these abandoned dwellings and absentee landlords exist all over the city of New Haven.
The problems are far deeper than housing.

Mr. Keitazulu in his comments understand the problem of inner-city troubled youth extremely well.  To many, he may appear to be somewhat eccentric, but if one listens intently to the brother’s substance, I’m sure they’ll come away with a greater knowledge of the issues pertaining to potentially troubled youth.

I don’t support him politically, but I respect him and his desire to raise pertinent issues germane to the criminal element, enormously.

This scourge will continue to be pervasive in Newhallville so long as the political leadership ignores the importance of community investment.  For example: Recently a collective group of alderman (from the area) voted to allow an organization to purchase the old Martin Luther King School on Dixwell Ave.

However, while being coddled by this group and others, where were the mandatory jobs for the citizens in the contiguous neighborhoods associated with this project?  Where was the apprenticeship programs for young people associated with this project?  Why weren’t the majority of the slots made available for the school age kids that live in Newhallville?

Continues….

posted by: Brian L. Jenkins on May 24, 2013  12:17pm

Continued…

This is a multimillion dollar project and these alderman voted for such a deal without incorporating the aforementioned questions in order to seal the deal.  And yet, it is their communities that are hemorrhaging economically.

I’m in no way trying to malign these public officials, but I would be remiss if I didn’t point out these deficiencies in their inability to understand the requirement of their position as public servants representing the area.

These five shootings could’ve easily have been five murders if we were dealing with individuals that were proficient in firearms.

The investment has to begin with the children who will at some point supplant those who are causing the present havoc by holding these communities hostage by their stupidity.

Events Calendar

loading…

SeeClickFix »

Other
Sep 1, 2014 8:18 am
Address: 41 Howe St New Haven, Connecticut
Rating: 5

noise disturbance by group of college students partying every other night till 3 am with loud...

more »
Potholes
Sep 1, 2014 6:43 am
Address: 154 Whitney Avenue Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
Rating: 2

Location, length, and depth make this pothole a particular hazard...

more »
*** REMOVE FOR SLOWDOWN ****

PosterWallAdd your Poster

Sponsors

N.H.I. Site Design & Development

smartpill design