Airport Will Fight Feds’ Fatal Decision
by Melissa Bailey | Mar 6, 2013 4:53 pm
Posted to: Transportation
Tweed-New Haven chief Tim Larson vowed to contest the federal government’s decision to close his airport’s air traffic control tower due to automatic budget cuts.
Larson was notified late Tuesday that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) plans to yank funding from Tweed’s air traffic control tower.
The move would threaten the airport’s long-term viability; it’s not clear if Tweed would have to close. The cuts come due to the federal “sequester,” automatic budget cuts forced by a failure of Democrats and Republicans in Washington to hatch a budget deal.
The FAA plans to close the tower on April 7, according to U.S. Sen. Dick Blumenthal.
Tweed’s fate has been up in the air since two weeks ago, when the airport learned it may lose its air traffic control tower. Airport Director Tim Larson said losing the tower wouldn’t immediately force the airport to close, but it would threaten the airport’s viability if the sole commercial airline, US Airways, chooses to stop serving the airport. US Airways currently runs four round-trip flights to Philadelphia from Tweed every day. Airline officials could not be reached for comment Wednesday; nor could Larson.
Larson said Tweed plans to appeal the decision. He said he does not know whether US Airways will pull out from the airport, nor whether Tweed would have to close. He plans to meet Thursday with US Airways and all other airport vendors to come up with a strategy to save the airport’s tower.
“We think we have a tremendous case for national security interest and volume,” Larson said.
He noted that Tweed does a lot of business with the FBI, which has an office in New Haven. Yale-New Haven Hospital, which uses the airport for medical flights, is a “huge proponent of the airport,” he added. If the tower closes, there would lots of medical flights that would have to be diverted, he said.
US Airways lifts 40,000 people into the air per year, according to Larson. In addition to the commercial flights, smaller, chartered planes make 75,000 departures per year.
“There are tons of other airports that are not our size and have smaller volumes,” Larson said.
Mayor John DeStefano said he learned of the tower’s slated closure Tuesday. He said he could not predict what it means for the airport’s fate: “We’re exploring what this is going to practically mean now.”
Local and statewide Democratic politicians have blasted Republicans in Washington for failing to come up with a solution to avoid the cuts.
Blumenthal said the FAA notified his office Wednesday that it plans to stop funding air traffic control towers at Connecticut’s six small airports—Sikorsky Memorial, Danbury Municipal, Groton-New London, Hartford-Brainard, Tweed-New Haven and Waterbury-Oxford—on April 7, because of the sequester.
He said he and the Connecticut delegation plan to “urge” the federal Department of Transportation to reverse the decision and keep Tweed open. Closing the air traffic control tower will “curtail or eliminate” commercial air traffic from Tweed, he predicted.
“We’ll make use of any possible avenue of redress or relief” to save Tweed, he said. In addition to the 120 people directly employed by Tweed, “hundreds if not thousands of good jobs” would be at risk as “a result of the ripple effect that Tweed’s closing would cause.”
Tweed has “enormous prospects for growth in commercial traffic, which would be largely eviscerated” by the loss of the air traffic control tower, Blumenthal argued. He called the cut “another example of the very preventable and unnecessary harmful effect of this slashing-across-the-board spending cuts.”
Blumenthal said he plans to work with a bipartisan coalition seeking to end the sequester. In the short-term, he will be asking “why Tweed?” He said preserving Tweed’s commercial flights is important; other small airports offer no commercial flights.
The FAA declined to confirm that it has made a final decision to close Tweed’s tower. In a speech delivered Wednesday, FAA Administrator Michael Huerta said “we are contemplating the closure” of “a large number of the 238 air traffic control towers that have fewer than 150,000 total flight operations,” and fewer than 10,000 commercial flight operations per year. That list includes Tweed and the five other Connecticut airports listed above; it does not include Bradley International Airport.
In a joint statement Wednesday afternoon, Connecticut’s delegation to Washington blasted the cuts.
“This move, which is entirely preventable, will have a direct impact on the residents employed by these airports who could lose their jobs, the local economies that rely on these facilities and the safety of our airports,” the delegation wrote. “We will continue our efforts to reverse the sequester and work toward a bipartisan compromise that will avoid these arbitrary across-the-board cuts that threaten to cause job losses in industries throughout the Connecticut economy.”
Tags: Tweed-New Haven Airport, Richard Blumenthal, Federal Aviation Administration, air traffic controllers
Post a Comment
So will every other airport. Good luck!
But in the end, nothing will happen…....
National security? Give me a break. It’s a contract airport. If Yale wants it open, open the checkbook and pay.
As for our congressional delegation - they are right. The yanked funding was entirely preventable. They have all known for 16 months this day was coming.
Instead of staying in DC and working for a solution, they came home to blast the probable cut. Now they blast again. With all due respect, it’s time to get off their collective backsides and get it done. No talk. Action. And by the way, Senators - you have not passed a budget in 4 years. 4 years.
As others have already said, solve the budget problem. Tweed is convenient when you can find a flight that works and you can afford the higher airfare, but the problem is the Federal Government. This Congressional Delegation is grandstanding when the FAA is only doing what Congress voted into law. Their time is better spent in DC working to solve the budget problems.
Three CT representatives including the one for New Haven voted against the original Budget Control Act of 2011, so they’re not grandstanding, they’re once again protesting against a stupid law they never supported to begin with.
Just spent a good while comparing Tweed to Bradley on this site:
They are NHV and BDL if you’re curious.
Flights out of Tweed to Chicago, Washington, California, Cancun, Paris, and more are all usually TWICE as expensive, and almost always at least 1.5 times as expensive, as Bradley.
The city needs to put together a five-year plan to grow the airport and have the buy-in from some major carriers. If they can’t get it done, then it needs to be closed. Put a Stew Leonard’s there, done.
You are either making it up or just lying. The entire Connecticut congressional delegation supported the sequester - all of them, including Joe Lieberman. So in fact, they all are grandstanding now, and what is now a question mark, is what if anything they have specifically offered to cut in lieu of sequester, or what if any specific actions have they taken to amend or end sequester besides holding weekly Friday pressers and “vowing to fight?” For 16 months they all knew this was coming and yet, to a person, seem surprised it arrived and now, after supporting it, they disown it.
I don’t know if you remember this, but the sequester didn’t appear out of thin air, it was a budget control act that was voted on.
John Larson, Rosa DeLauro and Chris Murphy all voted nay on it, along with 160 other representatives. Only one person is lying here and it isn’t me. You can believe what ever you want but it doesn’t change the actual voting record.
@ Curious: just anecdotal, but I just purchased a ticket last week from New Haven to Indianapolis; it was $296 from Tweed or $344 from Bradley (both with one layover each way). I fly frequently from Tweed and often find flights to be within $30-70 of prices to BDL, which, after factoring in my time and the cost of gas to drive back and forth to Windsor Locks, still makes Tweed a good deal. I guess the point is, it depends on where you’re going.