Top Cop Benefits As Case Drags On

A top cop accused of abusing his wife and making violent threats that spawned a SWAT response had his court case continued for at least the fifth time in 11 months — making it likelier he’ll receive more of his salary and then a bigger pension, while delaying full public knowledge about an internal police investigation into his actions.

Lt. Rahgue Tennant received his latest continuance Wednesday from Superior Court Judge Melanie Cradle in a domestic violence and hostage-taking case that dates back to September 2018, when the SWAT team responded to his purported threats to ​“light up” his house. He’s not scheduled to return to court for another month.

The state arrested Tennant for allegedly abusing his wife and holding his kids hostage at their East Shore home. State prosecutors have charged the former top Dixwell cop with six charges of domestic violence, including one felony count of second-degree assault, one felony count of first-degree unlawful restraint, one misdemeanor count of second-degree threatening, and three felony counts of risk of injury to a minor.

Tennant was scheduled to appear in Cradle’s groundfloor court room at 121 Elm St. at 10 a.m. on Wednesday.

At 10:45, a judicial marshal informed this reporter that Tennant’s attorney, Norm Pattis, had requested and received a continuance from Cradle, pushing back Tennant’s next day in court.

According to the state judicial website, Tennant’s case has been on the docket 18 times since he was first arrested last September.

Click here, here, and here to read about past court appearances, all of which featured brief discussions of how Tennant has been in compliance with the terms of his release and all of which resulted in another continuance.

$77,832.78 & Counting

As his case has plodded along for the past 11 months, the former top Dixwell cop has earned $77,832.78 while on paid administrative leave, according to information provided by the police department to the Independent in response to a Connecticut Freedom of Information Act request.

Tennant has also inched that much closer towards hitting the 20-year mark on the local police force, a critical threshold for receiving a significantly higher pension than those who retire or resign before two decades. Tennant was hired by the local police force on Jan. 25, 2000.

Tennant’s case has been continued so many times in part because of his participation in substance abuse and domestic violence diversionary programs, in which a judge says he has been in compliance. That participation could result in the charges ultimately being nolled, considering that this is his first time arrested. In turn, the police department has said it can’t discipline him for his alleged misdeeds until his court proceedings end — and a nolle would make it harder to fire him.

The case has also dragged on simply because of court dates that lawyers and the judge have missed over the months because of stated scheduling conflicts.

Per the current police contract, Tennant, just like any officer hired before 2012, would qualify for a permanent, lifetime 50 percent age annuity pension upon reaching two decades working for the NHPD.

The contract states that qualifying officers hired before 2012 are entitled to receive an annual pension of 2.5 percent of the average of their four highest years of earnings, multiplied by their total number of years on the force, once they hit the 20-year mark.

If they stay on the force more than 10 years but less than 20 years on the job, they are entitled to a much smaller pension. 

Per the contract, officers hired before 2012 who have worked for the NHPD for more than 10 years but less than 20 are entitled to an annual pension based off of 2 percent, not 2.5 percent, of their average pay from their final 10 years of service, not their four highest years of earnings.

The city has so far declined to provide the Independent with Tennant’s annual earnings for each of the past four years.

It has also failed to release records about his alleged misdeeds and the results of an internal investigation — with the explanation that none of that can be provided until Tennant’s court case is closed out. Which has now taken close to a year and counting. The public has yet to receive a full accounting of what the high-ranking officer allegedly did over a period of time and how the department handled it.

If Tennant retires and applies for a pension, that application would ultimately have to be approved or denied by the Policemen & Firemen’s Retirement Fund Board (P&F), which oversees the city’s public safety pension fund. (Click here to read an earlier story about one such controversial decision made by P&F, to grant a $91,000 annual pension to former narcotics cop Billy White after his arrest on federal corruption charges.)

It would be up to the Board of Police Commissioners to decide on any discipline of Tennant once his case is resolved. They likely won’t be able to invoke the police contract’s ​“Bad Boy” clause, as it allows the board to reduce or revoke pensions only for those convicted of crimes related to ​“any act of dishonesty or fraud.”

Board chair Anthony Dawson declined to comment specifically on Tennant’s case, as it is still in court and still under internal investigation at the department.

“We will review it and have a fair process around discipline or whatever the courts say and Internal Affairs suggest,” Dawson said.

A similar law exists at the state level, which would allow the state attorney general to appeal directly to the state Supreme Court to revoke or reduce public pensions. However, the law can be invoked in cases involving embezzlement, felonious theft from a public agency, bribery, or intentions to profit in a public role — not domestic violence.

Tennant’s attorney, Norm Pattis, did not respond to a request for comment by the publication time of this article.

Read a police report on Tennant’s Sept. 6 arrest below.

The Alleged Crime

Sgt. Shayna L.Kendall wrote an investigative report into the Tennant matter. The text of the report, including redactions (in brackets), follows:

On September 6, 2019 at approximately 1759 hours, I received a notification call-out for the Hostage Negotiation Team to stage at 830 Woodward Avenue (Distrcit 9 Substation). The information provided was that New Haven Police Lt. Rahgue Tennant barricaded himself in his residence at [ ] after not allowing his wife, [ ] and their three children to leave. Further information revealed that [ ] was able to escape with her children to a neighborhood residence.

Upon arrival to 830 Woodward Avenue, I was met by Command Staff as well as Emergency Services Personnel to discuss the details of the incident. ESU and partnering agencies reconvened to the area surrounding [ ] in an attempt to make contact with a despondent Lt. Rahgue Tennant. Shortly after communication was established, [ ] and her children were relocated to 830 Woodward Avenue where Detective C. Carr and I spoke with her about the events that led up to this incident.

[ ] presented with a discolored and swollen right eye and red marks on her chest and neck area [ ] was crying and in great concern for her well-being and the safety of that of her children and her mother. [ ] indicated that she has been in a relationship with Rahgue since 2004 and they became married in 2009.

[ ] stated that her movement had been restricted by Rahgue since Thursday, August 30, 2018. [ ] stated it was this date that Rahgue had become upset with her and threw a Lysol bottle at her head which caused a large hematoma. [ ] stated Rahgue invited Police Commissioner Greg Smith to their home and had dinner prepared in the oven. [ ] stated Rahgue became upset because the home required cleaning because they were expecting a guest. [ ] indicated that she could not understand if Rahgue became upset about the uncleanliness of the home or that there had been a fly in the home but he had subsequently left.

[ ] stated Rahgue had increased his alcoholic intake and would consume alcohol heavily especially when he would go out. [ ] stated it was no surprise to her that when Rahgue returned to the home, he was irritated. [ ] stated she had been in the bedroom putting the children to bed when Rahgue turned on the lights and began to argue about not having food prepared for him. Raghue stated, ​“You didn’t make no fucking diner?” [ ] stated she initially told Rahgue that the food was in the oven, however, realized he was agitated and had been out drinking which provoked her to get up to prepare the food for him.

[ ] stated Rahgue told her ​“from now on when you have something to throw in the trash, you walk your lazy ass outside and throw it in the trash.” [ ] advised Rahgue that they would have to come up with a different solution which [ ] believed Rahgue interpreted as her being disrespectful. Meanwhile [ ] stated she was carrying the dinner plate when Rahgue threw the Lysol can at her head striking her head and face [ ] stated the impact almost instantly created a large hematoma on her head.

[ ] stated she believed Rahgue knew he hurt her, however, perhaps not as bad as he did. [ ] stated Rahgue told her to put ice on her face to avoid the children seeing her face. [ ] stated Rahgue instructed her to go seek treatment at the hospital and to ​“tell them everything” but warned ​“you’ll lose everything.” [ ] became fearful and interpreted this comment as Rahgue may ​“kill” and cause harm to their children. [ ] therefore was unable to seek adequate medical treatment and was told to heal herself by Rahgue. [ ] stated she did not sleep that night and the hematoma began to drain which caused her discolored eye and right side of her face.

[ ] advised that the following day, Rahgue went to Walmart to purchase makeup to conceal her bruising as well as a variety of treatment interventions. [ ] stated at one point Rahgue yelled at her for possibly laying on her injury which made the swelling and appearance of the injury worse. [ ] stated Rahgue would not allow her to leave the home as someone may see and inquire about her head and face. [ ] added Rahgue maintained possession of the family vehicles as well. [ ] stated this was the only instance of physical abuse she endured from Thursday August 30, 2018 until police arrived on September 6, 2018.

[ ] stated in the following days succeeding this incident, Rahgue pulled out several of his weapons and began to clean them in her their bedroom. [ ] stated Rahgue had never done this and while doing so told her that if ​“anyone comes in the house will get lit up.” [ ] knew this to mean Rahgue would shoot them and feared for her safety as well. With a combination of his words and the cleaning of his weapons in her presence, [ ] feared this was a reality.

[ ] stated she believed threats Rahgue made to be true due to historical abuse where Rahgue has told her that if she threatened the loss of anything he had worked hard for, she would not live to enjoy it. [ ] stated Rahgue had become increasingly aggressive with the more power he obtained within the police department and he had purchased new equipment including magazines and ammunition for his weapons.

[ ] stated she had been planning to seek permanent refuge away from Rahgue due to the ongoing physical violence which also included financial abuse, verbal and emotional abuse. [ ] stated Rahgue does not allow her to work to maintain dominance and control over he. [ ] stated over the past few days she has been contacting Umbrella Center to obtain services and was looking to relocate. It was on September 6, 2018 that Umbrella was notified about physical abuse to [ ] and Rahgue’s children and subsequently notified Department of Children and Families.

[ ] stated she was familiar was familiar with the mandated reporting system and knew that Umbrella would report the incident which is what sparked her need to seek immediate refuge. [ ] stated DCF responded to her home on September 6, 2018. [ ] stated she tried to minimize her communication with them and was given a contact card by the DCF worker.

[ ] stated Rahgue arrived and asked why DCF was at his home. [ ] stated they have surveillance within their home as well as notifications Rahgue receives when someone comes to the home. [ ] stated Rahgue demanded to know and became extremely paranoid. [ ] stated Rahgue was peering through the blinds and was able to speak to someone. [ ] stated she could not hear exactly what he was saying, however, Rahgue told her ​“now Tony and Herb calling me.” Rahgue was referring to Assistant Chief Otonial Reyes as well as Patrol Commander Lt. Herbert Sharp. [ ] stated Rahgue initially refused to answer and told her to ​“tell em I’m in the shower.” [ ] stated she then received a call [ ] which Rahgue stated ​“I don’t answer the phone so Tony gets his wife to all you.”

[ ] stated she answered the phone and attempted to convey that everything was going fine, however, she soon realized that Assistant Chief Reyes was on the phone. [ ] stated she was asked if she was alright and she responded affirmatively and quickly told him she would call him back.

[ ] stated as she heard the shower running, she knew this was her only opportunity to flee the home with her children. [ ] stated she frantically ran to [ ] and entered the unlocked home of [a witness].

[ ] continue to provide historical abuse information which she had never reported to the police. [ ] had to be redirected several times as it appeared as though when speaking of one instance of abuse, it triggered an instance of another familiar time. [ ] stated her children has been present during abusive altercations including this incident and has shown signs of being affected by it. [ ] was advised that her children would be interviewed forensically with her consent as well as obtain services from Yale Child Study.

I subsequently met with Lauigina Allen of DCF Milford. Allen advised me that she received a referral on September 6, 2018 at 1850 hours. The minimum information provided on the referral was that [ ] advised of a fear of physical violence and was fearful of retaliation. Allen stated she and another DCF worker attempted to make contact with [ ] first at 278 Peck Street, however, was unsuccessful. Allen stated they then went to [ ] and did not initially get an answer at the door. Allen stated as they were walking away, [ ] opened the door and Allen asked if her husband (Rahgue) was home. [ ] told Allen he was not, however, decided it was not a good time to speak with Allen.

Allen stated she received a call from Rahgue inquiring as to why she had come to his home. Allen stated Rahuge was initially apprehensive and suspicious asking if Allen was truly a representative of DCF. Allen stated the Program Manager Tricia Falcone then spoke with Rahgue to advise and confirm Allen was from DCF. Allen stated Raghue was informed of their DCF protocol and that an investigation would need to be completed to include a welfare check of the children. Rahgue was adamant that no one was coming to his home and the New Haven Police Department was contacted. Allen stated she spoke with Sgt. C Fennessey who told her that he would coordinate personnel to accompany them on the necessary welfare check. Allen stated before that could be accomplished, the incident turned into a hostage incident.

After speaking with Allen, Detective Carr and I went to 20 York Street CIU in an effort to make contact with Rahgue Tennant. Upon initial contact, Rahgue indicated that he did not feel well and was suffering from a headache.

Following contact with Rahgue, we met with [a witness]. [The witness] stated that she was home with her elderly mother and son when [ ] entered her unlocked home in a panic. [The witness] stated [ ] had her children with her and all [ ] was saying was to ​“Call 9 – 1‑1.” [The witness] stated at this point she did not know what happened and assumed someone was chasing [ ]. [The witness] stated [ ] locked the door to her home and then started to lock doors and windows inside of her home in apparent fear.

[The witness] stated she heard [ ] talking on the phone and gathered what occurred. It should be noted, [the witness] was initially apprehensive in speaking to Detective Carr and I and stated she was fearful of retaliation if information was provided to Rahgue that she aided [ ] as well as spoke to the police.